I've decided that most screening tests are barbaric and satanic. When my doctor wanted me to go for a colonoscopy, I received the documents and actually read them. It was stated that about 1 in 1000 people suffer a perforated bowel during the procedure. I decided that the risk of that was much greater than colon cancer and declined the test. I did have the 'poop' test where they examine your poop and all was fine.
I had a colonoscopy where they had to remove several polyps. They said because of the anesthesia I would be sort of out of it for a day or so and needed someone with me. Unfortunately my sister left and two neighbors (practically strangers) persuaded me that it was the next day and I needed to give them money and go to work. God knows what they did in my house when I was gone. The problems with memory, almost like dementia lasted weeks. I think the anesthesia damaged my liver because that can cause these effects. It was very scary. They should keep people at the hospital until they are ok. My gut issues got better. I do think the colonoscopy was necessary but there needs to be more follow up and more information about possible side effects.
In 2019 I received my first colonoscopy. Then the Convid epidemic hit. I just dont trust the medical complex anymore. The less I have to go into a hospital the better. I have family member with colon cancer up until the Convid jab no one had cancer. Now my sister has skin cancer and lupus and mother had breast and skin cancer and now my stepfather has an aggressive form of bladder cancer. All had the jabs.
Would it be more appropriate to start with a stool sample test as a preventive measure and use the results to determine whether a colonoscopy is necessary?
Smart question. This is what they do in Sweden. They take your stool sample and test it for any tiny traces of blood with very sophisticated methods. My doctor actually chuckled and said, "So in the U.S. this is your 60th birthday present - a colonoscopy?" He went on to tell me that colonoscopies are not entirely safe and that is why they are not routinely performed over there.
Very invasive procedure! Not needed. If blood is found on a Hemacult test with no active signs of bleeding (no hemorrhoids or constipation leading to smudges of blood on your toilet paper) I would adopt a wait and see philosophy. Personally, I believe ALLL cancer is parasites! Active BLEEDING would get me to the nearest hospital for intervention. Follow Joe Tippens and his Fenbendazole journey! Personally, I’ll NEVER have this test. I'll also never let someone squish my breasts between two cold plates and irradiate them. We KNOW ionizing radiation causes cellular mutation!
In 1985, I had my first colonoscopy at 23, i had a bowel movement that literally filled the toilet with blood, so we headed to the ER. They did the procedure in the ER, with no anesthesia what so ever, I felt the sigmoidoscope all the way into my belly button, I was screaming into a pillow it hurt so bad, and all to no avail, nothing was found, just “maybe” a tiny fissure. Never had any problems after that. The next time I had the procedure I was under anesthesia, 20 years later, just for a baseline screening, totally different experience. Hate the prep tho!
I had my last colonoscopy at age 62. One before that at 55. Both had no polyps. The doctor wanted to schedule me for another one. I've had a bowel resection and have 22 stomach ulcers. Recent test showed no H Pyloric. I'm not getting another one, ever. My bowel problem was from blood clots. Thankfully I never took the COVID "vaccine" and I'll never take any vaccines again. I haven't even had a flu/pneumonia shot in 40+ years. Recently I've been diagnosed with Parkinson's disease from the toxic water at Camp Lejeune when I was there. I no longer trust the mainstream medical industry.
My gut is my friend…I have NEVER & never will killed it hoping the new tenants will be better. So many friends tell me they don't feel right after their first colonoscopy. You can kill your gut with antibiotics for much cheaper if that's your goal,.
Why are doctors always trying to shove things in up and down your holes? Unless they can give me a very specific and explicit reason, I refuse virtually all invasive and routine tests other than bloodwork and only if it's covered by my insurance provided I have any at any given time.
I've decided that most screening tests are barbaric and satanic. When my doctor wanted me to go for a colonoscopy, I received the documents and actually read them. It was stated that about 1 in 1000 people suffer a perforated bowel during the procedure. I decided that the risk of that was much greater than colon cancer and declined the test. I did have the 'poop' test where they examine your poop and all was fine.
I had a colonoscopy where they had to remove several polyps. They said because of the anesthesia I would be sort of out of it for a day or so and needed someone with me. Unfortunately my sister left and two neighbors (practically strangers) persuaded me that it was the next day and I needed to give them money and go to work. God knows what they did in my house when I was gone. The problems with memory, almost like dementia lasted weeks. I think the anesthesia damaged my liver because that can cause these effects. It was very scary. They should keep people at the hospital until they are ok. My gut issues got better. I do think the colonoscopy was necessary but there needs to be more follow up and more information about possible side effects.
I intuitively knew having some sicko doctor shove some device up my ass was not a good idea.
In 2019 I received my first colonoscopy. Then the Convid epidemic hit. I just dont trust the medical complex anymore. The less I have to go into a hospital the better. I have family member with colon cancer up until the Convid jab no one had cancer. Now my sister has skin cancer and lupus and mother had breast and skin cancer and now my stepfather has an aggressive form of bladder cancer. All had the jabs.
It is frightening how many are now suffering from cancer and the 'treatments' which in my opinion is just more barbaric and satanic 'medicine'.
I 'met' Dr. Tenpenny through the Bolinger series "The Truth About Cancer" if I remember correctly. Amazing medical truth.
Would it be more appropriate to start with a stool sample test as a preventive measure and use the results to determine whether a colonoscopy is necessary?
Smart question. This is what they do in Sweden. They take your stool sample and test it for any tiny traces of blood with very sophisticated methods. My doctor actually chuckled and said, "So in the U.S. this is your 60th birthday present - a colonoscopy?" He went on to tell me that colonoscopies are not entirely safe and that is why they are not routinely performed over there.
That is an easy test and in my opinion, the only one needed unless something comes back with concern.
Very invasive procedure! Not needed. If blood is found on a Hemacult test with no active signs of bleeding (no hemorrhoids or constipation leading to smudges of blood on your toilet paper) I would adopt a wait and see philosophy. Personally, I believe ALLL cancer is parasites! Active BLEEDING would get me to the nearest hospital for intervention. Follow Joe Tippens and his Fenbendazole journey! Personally, I’ll NEVER have this test. I'll also never let someone squish my breasts between two cold plates and irradiate them. We KNOW ionizing radiation causes cellular mutation!
The Veterans Hospital wants me to have one every 4 years. They have NEVER found anything. I said no more.
In 1985, I had my first colonoscopy at 23, i had a bowel movement that literally filled the toilet with blood, so we headed to the ER. They did the procedure in the ER, with no anesthesia what so ever, I felt the sigmoidoscope all the way into my belly button, I was screaming into a pillow it hurt so bad, and all to no avail, nothing was found, just “maybe” a tiny fissure. Never had any problems after that. The next time I had the procedure I was under anesthesia, 20 years later, just for a baseline screening, totally different experience. Hate the prep tho!
Never had one. Never going to. I’m 55, and when God wants to take me out, nothing will stop Him.
I had my last colonoscopy at age 62. One before that at 55. Both had no polyps. The doctor wanted to schedule me for another one. I've had a bowel resection and have 22 stomach ulcers. Recent test showed no H Pyloric. I'm not getting another one, ever. My bowel problem was from blood clots. Thankfully I never took the COVID "vaccine" and I'll never take any vaccines again. I haven't even had a flu/pneumonia shot in 40+ years. Recently I've been diagnosed with Parkinson's disease from the toxic water at Camp Lejeune when I was there. I no longer trust the mainstream medical industry.
It’s torture for profit. Before, during and after.
My gut is my friend…I have NEVER & never will killed it hoping the new tenants will be better. So many friends tell me they don't feel right after their first colonoscopy. You can kill your gut with antibiotics for much cheaper if that's your goal,.
Colonoscopies are actually the ongoing search for Jimmy Hoffa.
I knew it. Instinctively.
Why are doctors always trying to shove things in up and down your holes? Unless they can give me a very specific and explicit reason, I refuse virtually all invasive and routine tests other than bloodwork and only if it's covered by my insurance provided I have any at any given time.