Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nicole larson's avatar

Thank you for sharing. I’m a recovering nurse of repeating “safe and effective” and complete trust in the medical community. Heart breaking

Expand full comment
Freedom Fox's avatar

I first discovered this study in the NIH National Library of Medicine in July-August, 2020 when I searched the keywords, "PCR" and "vaccine." There were many studies available, including this one. And when I added "influenza" many more appeared, though most results were about vaccinating horses for influenza. Those studies demonstrated that the flu vaccine itself can be identified as the source of an outbreak of influenza in horses. Specific vaccines from specific years, all with unique identifiers.

Just like in this study that demonstrated that specific polio vaccines are identified in PCR assays. I knew then, July-August, 2020 that vaccines would drive the pandemic, not end it. Called a conspiracy theorist at the time. But I followed the Science. And have learned sooo much more since, about all vaccines, and what they really are. This study is just about a small part of your piece. But I believe it to be corroborating evidence. And I'm interested in your thoughts? And a theory I have that the Covid varients are actually from the vaccines themselves. My suspicion that Delta, Omicron, most all of them could be traced back to specific vaccines if the PCR tests were configured to detect the unique identifiers. And the possibility that even the ordinary seasonal flu itself can be identified and traced to a specific flu vaccine design. A working hypothesis.

Nearly Constant Shedding of Diverse Enteric Viruses by Two Healthy Infants

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November, 2012

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3486243/

"In order to determine the extent of viral infections occurring in early childhood, longitudinally collected stool samples from two siblings who grew up in the mid-1980s in the United Kingdom were tested using an extensive panel of PCR primers against 15 groups of viruses to measure the overall frequency and duration of viral shedding."

...

"Child 1...The first trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (tOPV) was given at day 107. Poliovirus vaccine strain Sabin-2 (HEV-C species) was identified in the first sample analyzed from day 116, and the shedding continued until day 180 (73 days after tOPV administration)."

...

"child 2..."Following tOPV administration on day 129, poliovirus vaccine strain shedding was recorded until day 183, starting with the first collected sample on day 142. Poliovirus (PV) shedding therefore lasted for 54 days after the first tOPV administration."

...

"The availability of frequently collected fecal samples allowed a detailed analysis of viral shedding occurring during the first year of life in two infant sibling from a developed country. A total of 92% of the 72 samples analyzed contained at least one human virus, with some samples containing up to five different viruses. The average fecal samples contained 1.8 viruses. While symptoms requiring hospitalizations were not observed in these two infants, some of the minor signs of infections, such as runny nose and loose stools, frequently seen in infants of that age, may have been caused by these viral infections or coinfections."

...

"The surprisingly high rate of virus detection reported here may still represent an underestimate of viral shedding due to viruses being below levels of detection of the PCR assays used. The intermittent detections seen for the more persistent infections, including HPBV-GI, HPeV-1, HPeV-6, and HBoV-1, may indeed reflect fluctuation of the viral loads below detection levels. Other missed infections may also have resulted in very transient shedding occurring between the nearly weekly collected sampled analyzed here.

Our study showed that two healthy infant siblings were nearly constantly shedding a wide range of enteric viruses during their first year of life. While only two children were analyzed, their customary upbringing indicates that the diversity and duration of enteric viral shedding observed here may reflect that of typical infants in developed countries. Testing of longitudinally collected samples from a larger number of infants will be required to further substantiate this conclusion.

The high number of different infections and in some cases their long-term persistence detected here by PCR show that as more sensitive methods of viral detection are used, an increasing number of asymptomatic infections can be detected, likely reflecting effective passive and/or active immunity in generally healthy infants. The possibly substantial effect on the education of these infants' immune systems of such frequent and long-lasting viral infections, including protection from subsequent challenges with closely related viruses, remains to be determined."

I invite readers to visit https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and do their own keyword search for research like this.

Note: All research found in search returns needs to be validated. Many authors take shortcuts, misinterpret data or other sources, have agendas. Seeing who funded it is a quick indicator, but often times you must go back and read the research they cite to ensure they are presenting it accurately. To do good research you've got to follow a lot of footnotes and use your head. But it's not rocket science that requires university taught expertise.

Expand full comment
50 more comments...

No posts