Mitigation strategies (shielding) can provide varying degrees of protection in the home which might provide some relief in the short term. But ultimately there are no mitigation strategies because the technology requires the entire atmosphere to be radiated.
Unless we want to move about inside concrete bunkers on wheels the only solution is to remove the infrastructure (cell towers/ wifi stations) and return to a wired paradigm. After all, insects, birds, trees, cows, dogs and cats cannot be protected even if humans decided to live inside concrete bunkers, so the whole topic is moot.
It is better to just accept this technology is a dead end now, and let it collapse before any more wireless infrastructure is built.
Even if we returned to a 1990's paradigm of landlines, phone booths and wired internet we'd instantly see a huge boost in health and wellbeing, and insects and birds would begin to recover after their catastrophic declines over the past 30 years.
Pushing mitigation strategies is really just helping to keep consumers in denial a bit longer. And this will just make the pain even worse when we eventually have to abandon this toxic tech.
Thank you Dr. Tenpenny. Have you read the Invisible Rainbow by chance? I work with Arthur Firstenberg helping him get his message out via Substack. I am also a BBA (building biology advocate) and blog about how we can use ancestral strategies like Sunlight to harness our body's vital potential:
Great to see this topic getting the long-overdue exposure it deserves. WiFi, Cell Phone EMFs, Dirty electricity are a scourge destroying the health of this tech-addicted generation. Walk under the new streetlights with their 5G transmitters in store parking lots or along the streets of any upcoming 15 min city, and if you're EMF-sensitive, you'll feel the ringing in the ears, pressure in the head etc. We're allowing ourselves to be microwaved, but no one wants to rain on the party by addressing this elephant in the room. And so we continue to allow ourselves, our children, our animals and even plants, to be immersed in this genotoxic electro-frequency soup. This is off-the-scale in hospitals and schools, where our most vulnerable community members are found. Our office buildings are the same. THIS IS NOT SMART TECHNOLOGY. It is completely insane, and people will soon see it is now our virtual prison.
Thank you for this, Sherri, I've been hearing about EMFs for years and never really knew what they were. It's very helpful!
But I also want to say what a surprise it was to meet your colleague here in Cumberland! As I was leaving a restaurant, I stopped to tell this beautiful woman how much I liked her dress but before I could open my mouth, she said the same to me. She had noticed my book, Whitney Webb's One Nation Under Blackmail, and one thing led to another, I sat down and we shared wine, dessert and conspiracy theories. And that, of course, was your colleague's wife in the beautiful dress ;-)
Out of all the health/bio hacks that are out there in the mainstream, mitigating the EMF from my phone and wifi router have been among the most beneficial.
- Better Sleep
- Improved Focus
- Better Mood
One of the best things I can do for my productivity is to go out to the middle of nowhere without my phone for half an hour to an hour.
Having a communications background in the Marine Corps and being aware of what frequencies are harmful I was always perplexed at folks willingness to adopt 5G for their daily use.
This is an amazing report! Thank You, Dr Tenpenny for the excellent information presented here…and for your tireless work helping humanity! Forever grateful to have found you in Jan 2020 with info on the bioweapon jabs! ❤️
EMR's can and do and have a negative effect on living beings, including animals. I am extremely sensitive to them. Really, the only proven affective way to protect ourselves from them is
physical shields. I am skeptical of all companies that claim they can have an affect by attaching some device to interrupt them.
I remain skeptical of the extent of the hazards posed by EMF. Although I have no medical training, I do, in fact have an STEM degree (computer science) and for my military enlistment worked at facilities that had RF generating equipment such as microwave links. More on this below.
Note that by no means do I deny that exposure to EMF (also called RF energy) doesn't pose risks -- to some people, for some level of exposure. In fact, that is my main "evidence" of harms that RF may cause.
Although I never worked on the actual radio equipment, the risks to technicians has been known for many decades, back into the early 20th century. Exposure to high-power radio frequency can heat body tissue just like a microwave oven, but probably to a lesser degree. Cataracts and sterility were two risks I recall. There are probably more.
Major point: there should be studies dating back a long time that would have examined the occupational risks and impacts on health of microwave technicians and others with similar occupational exposure.
But exposure at the (I'm assuming!!!) very, very low levels commonly experienced by the average consumer? Of these, I am much more dubious.
Is there a correlation between power lines and health risks? Perhaps. I first heard about this in the early
1980s. The father of a childhood friend worked on EPA contracts. His expertise was multiple factor analysis. Mr. X observed that there are many, many factors to consider and that one should not jump to a conclusion e.g. it must be the EMF causing a higher incidence of cancers among those who live close to major power lines. But wait just a minute. It's affecting kids, you say? Well, what else do chidren do? Don't they play outside? Yes, they do. And what other activity is often seen along power line rights of way? How abouot spraying herbicides, just to name one? Herbicides are a known risk factor (not just to herbs!).
Oh, by the way, I find it amusing there is rarely any mention of microwave ovens as RF source in the home. Yet nearly every home and office has one, and that's been true for decades.
At least the author offers some common sense suggestions: You cannot do much about a nearby cell tower irradiating your area, but you should have near-total control over what's inside your living spaces. No need to return to the 19th century. If you're concerned about RF/EMF risks, just minimize your use of such device and/or keep them as far away as practicable. Using a cell phone too much has risks distinct from EMF, such as distraction of what's going on around one, repetitive motion injury, eye problems, as well as claims of pyschological harm from simply spending too much time online.
Anyway, I remain agnostic on the risks posed by our everyday electronics.
We are experiencing an epidemic of chronic fatigue, stress, anxiety, depression, insomnia, depression, brain fog, diabetes, obesity and anhedonia - all of which are known symptoms of exposure to microwave pollution.
The majority of these symptoms are misdiagnosed / undiagnosed by a health system which is based on selling drugs (not addressing the causes of disease) which is why doctors get zero training in the effects of EMR.
The human body (and all life) is fundamentally an electrical system, and we are literally electrifying the atmosphere with non-native EMR at levels that no organism ever evolved to handle. The only reason why this is not cause for concern among government health and environmental agencies is MONEY (they are all bought and paid for).
We've seen 75% - 100% declines in insects since the rollout of consumer cell phone infrastructure in the 1990's. Increasingly we are no seeing birds falling out of the sky near to cell towers too. Twenty years ago it was sparrows, now it is ducks and vultures. Soon it will be cats and dogs.
Millions of humans are already so debilitated they can no longer stand to be around wifi. Many are forced to leave cities and live in a cabin in the woods or in camper vans. Simple live blood analysis using a standard light microscope has shown that normal healthy blood can coagulate into a sticky 'gloop' with just a few hours of exposure to wifi.
Bees are officially extinct in several US states now. Birds are routinely dying en masse (literally falling out the skies). Children (who are generally more susceptible) are getting so sick in wifi classrooms that many countries are now removing wifi from the classroom. France has outlawed it for nursery schools. A student in the UK recently won a case against wifi in schools under discrimination laws.
This technology is ALREADY proven to be toxic to all biological life, completely unsustainable and it will all have to go. There are no mitigation strategies that can make microwave pollution safe. We have to revert back to plugging our gadgets in with wires if we are to save the insects, birds, cows, soil microbes, cats, dogs, trees and human race.
Already if you go into 'smart' cities with lots of wireless pollution you can see that it is a sterile environment. Most people haven't noticed because (1) the wireless industry has captured all media, government agencies and the scientific establishment (2) most people are so mesmerised by their smart gadgets they no longer observe the world around them.
Insurance companies won't touch wireless tech with a bargepole, the wireless industry warns shareholders to expect massive lawsuits for injury and disease in the near future and it is already being removed from schools because it's making children sick. In other words the wireless industry is already collapsing and the wireless paradigm is already a 'dead duck'........ even as it continues to be marketed as the future of everything.
If wireless did NOT have such potential for surveillance and effortless control of society it would have already been ditched. The technocrats are just as addicted to this technology as the average consumer.
Nobody wants to admit the truth - that it is so toxic it must all be dumped into a giant skip.
The technocrats want to replace everything natural with artificial versions. Robot bees, robot workers, robot police, robot dogs, robot cashiers, robot everything. For them the toxicity of wireless is killing two birds with one stone (literally).
It will be up to the consumer to throw their toxic gadgets away, as many are already doing. Eventually (and not too far away) wireless will be regarded like smoking. A dirty, filthy, selfish habit which has no place in public spaces..... or anywhere where biological life exists.
The frequency of electromagnetic signals is critically important when determining their level of hazard, while being almost completely ignored by all those decrying those hazards. Additionally, none of the experts seem to have ever heard of the inverse square law and its relevance. Those wishing to learn more about both of these factors should watch eng.unimelb.edu.au/engage-with-us/lectures/davis-2015
thanks for EMF Solutions name.
Mitigation strategies (shielding) can provide varying degrees of protection in the home which might provide some relief in the short term. But ultimately there are no mitigation strategies because the technology requires the entire atmosphere to be radiated.
Unless we want to move about inside concrete bunkers on wheels the only solution is to remove the infrastructure (cell towers/ wifi stations) and return to a wired paradigm. After all, insects, birds, trees, cows, dogs and cats cannot be protected even if humans decided to live inside concrete bunkers, so the whole topic is moot.
It is better to just accept this technology is a dead end now, and let it collapse before any more wireless infrastructure is built.
Even if we returned to a 1990's paradigm of landlines, phone booths and wired internet we'd instantly see a huge boost in health and wellbeing, and insects and birds would begin to recover after their catastrophic declines over the past 30 years.
Pushing mitigation strategies is really just helping to keep consumers in denial a bit longer. And this will just make the pain even worse when we eventually have to abandon this toxic tech.
Your Substack is empty. Do readers have to pledge to get access to anything?
not sure why you can't see it. Here's the link
https://drtenpenny.substack.com/p/take-charge-of-emf-exposure
Thank you Dr. Tenpenny. Have you read the Invisible Rainbow by chance? I work with Arthur Firstenberg helping him get his message out via Substack. I am also a BBA (building biology advocate) and blog about how we can use ancestral strategies like Sunlight to harness our body's vital potential:
https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/pale-skinned-people-need-to-eat-their
@Arthur Firstenberg
Hey Dr. Tenpenny! I really liked this article, is there a way I can get in touch with you?
The infernal towers certainly cause a lot of symptoms:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-invasion-of-the-infernal-towers
It's not "only" cell towers. Neutralizing radiation exposure sounds optimistic to me:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-you-want-to-know-your-radiation
The latest forms of the technology don't even require towers:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/enforcing-smart-households-with-your
I'm EMF sensitive and feel my skin burning especially with wifi. EMFsol products helped me almost instantly as soon as i began using
Great to see this topic getting the long-overdue exposure it deserves. WiFi, Cell Phone EMFs, Dirty electricity are a scourge destroying the health of this tech-addicted generation. Walk under the new streetlights with their 5G transmitters in store parking lots or along the streets of any upcoming 15 min city, and if you're EMF-sensitive, you'll feel the ringing in the ears, pressure in the head etc. We're allowing ourselves to be microwaved, but no one wants to rain on the party by addressing this elephant in the room. And so we continue to allow ourselves, our children, our animals and even plants, to be immersed in this genotoxic electro-frequency soup. This is off-the-scale in hospitals and schools, where our most vulnerable community members are found. Our office buildings are the same. THIS IS NOT SMART TECHNOLOGY. It is completely insane, and people will soon see it is now our virtual prison.
Thank you for this, Sherri, I've been hearing about EMFs for years and never really knew what they were. It's very helpful!
But I also want to say what a surprise it was to meet your colleague here in Cumberland! As I was leaving a restaurant, I stopped to tell this beautiful woman how much I liked her dress but before I could open my mouth, she said the same to me. She had noticed my book, Whitney Webb's One Nation Under Blackmail, and one thing led to another, I sat down and we shared wine, dessert and conspiracy theories. And that, of course, was your colleague's wife in the beautiful dress ;-)
What a small world in a small town!
Super cool! It’s really closer to 3 degrees of separation!!
Thank you for this information.
Out of all the health/bio hacks that are out there in the mainstream, mitigating the EMF from my phone and wifi router have been among the most beneficial.
- Better Sleep
- Improved Focus
- Better Mood
One of the best things I can do for my productivity is to go out to the middle of nowhere without my phone for half an hour to an hour.
Having a communications background in the Marine Corps and being aware of what frequencies are harmful I was always perplexed at folks willingness to adopt 5G for their daily use.
What did you use for your phone?
I have Galaxy Samsung 9. I have it far from me when I'm working throughout most of the day and on the other side of the room from me when I sleep.
The inverse square law proves that electromagnetic radiation can be avoided by separating oneself from its sources.
Great information DR Tenpenny, thank you!
Here is Substack piece on EMF from Robert Yoho MD (ret), "Surviving Healthcare"...
https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/235-ghostbusters-2-an-electrical#details
This is an amazing report! Thank You, Dr Tenpenny for the excellent information presented here…and for your tireless work helping humanity! Forever grateful to have found you in Jan 2020 with info on the bioweapon jabs! ❤️
thank you so much. Please share!
Shared on Truth and Gab ❤️
Thank you! I'm going to implement your mitigation suggestions!
EMR's can and do and have a negative effect on living beings, including animals. I am extremely sensitive to them. Really, the only proven affective way to protect ourselves from them is
physical shields. I am skeptical of all companies that claim they can have an affect by attaching some device to interrupt them.
I remain skeptical of the extent of the hazards posed by EMF. Although I have no medical training, I do, in fact have an STEM degree (computer science) and for my military enlistment worked at facilities that had RF generating equipment such as microwave links. More on this below.
Note that by no means do I deny that exposure to EMF (also called RF energy) doesn't pose risks -- to some people, for some level of exposure. In fact, that is my main "evidence" of harms that RF may cause.
Although I never worked on the actual radio equipment, the risks to technicians has been known for many decades, back into the early 20th century. Exposure to high-power radio frequency can heat body tissue just like a microwave oven, but probably to a lesser degree. Cataracts and sterility were two risks I recall. There are probably more.
Major point: there should be studies dating back a long time that would have examined the occupational risks and impacts on health of microwave technicians and others with similar occupational exposure.
But exposure at the (I'm assuming!!!) very, very low levels commonly experienced by the average consumer? Of these, I am much more dubious.
Is there a correlation between power lines and health risks? Perhaps. I first heard about this in the early
1980s. The father of a childhood friend worked on EPA contracts. His expertise was multiple factor analysis. Mr. X observed that there are many, many factors to consider and that one should not jump to a conclusion e.g. it must be the EMF causing a higher incidence of cancers among those who live close to major power lines. But wait just a minute. It's affecting kids, you say? Well, what else do chidren do? Don't they play outside? Yes, they do. And what other activity is often seen along power line rights of way? How abouot spraying herbicides, just to name one? Herbicides are a known risk factor (not just to herbs!).
Oh, by the way, I find it amusing there is rarely any mention of microwave ovens as RF source in the home. Yet nearly every home and office has one, and that's been true for decades.
At least the author offers some common sense suggestions: You cannot do much about a nearby cell tower irradiating your area, but you should have near-total control over what's inside your living spaces. No need to return to the 19th century. If you're concerned about RF/EMF risks, just minimize your use of such device and/or keep them as far away as practicable. Using a cell phone too much has risks distinct from EMF, such as distraction of what's going on around one, repetitive motion injury, eye problems, as well as claims of pyschological harm from simply spending too much time online.
Anyway, I remain agnostic on the risks posed by our everyday electronics.
We are experiencing an epidemic of chronic fatigue, stress, anxiety, depression, insomnia, depression, brain fog, diabetes, obesity and anhedonia - all of which are known symptoms of exposure to microwave pollution.
The majority of these symptoms are misdiagnosed / undiagnosed by a health system which is based on selling drugs (not addressing the causes of disease) which is why doctors get zero training in the effects of EMR.
The human body (and all life) is fundamentally an electrical system, and we are literally electrifying the atmosphere with non-native EMR at levels that no organism ever evolved to handle. The only reason why this is not cause for concern among government health and environmental agencies is MONEY (they are all bought and paid for).
We've seen 75% - 100% declines in insects since the rollout of consumer cell phone infrastructure in the 1990's. Increasingly we are no seeing birds falling out of the sky near to cell towers too. Twenty years ago it was sparrows, now it is ducks and vultures. Soon it will be cats and dogs.
Millions of humans are already so debilitated they can no longer stand to be around wifi. Many are forced to leave cities and live in a cabin in the woods or in camper vans. Simple live blood analysis using a standard light microscope has shown that normal healthy blood can coagulate into a sticky 'gloop' with just a few hours of exposure to wifi.
Bees are officially extinct in several US states now. Birds are routinely dying en masse (literally falling out the skies). Children (who are generally more susceptible) are getting so sick in wifi classrooms that many countries are now removing wifi from the classroom. France has outlawed it for nursery schools. A student in the UK recently won a case against wifi in schools under discrimination laws.
This technology is ALREADY proven to be toxic to all biological life, completely unsustainable and it will all have to go. There are no mitigation strategies that can make microwave pollution safe. We have to revert back to plugging our gadgets in with wires if we are to save the insects, birds, cows, soil microbes, cats, dogs, trees and human race.
Already if you go into 'smart' cities with lots of wireless pollution you can see that it is a sterile environment. Most people haven't noticed because (1) the wireless industry has captured all media, government agencies and the scientific establishment (2) most people are so mesmerised by their smart gadgets they no longer observe the world around them.
Insurance companies won't touch wireless tech with a bargepole, the wireless industry warns shareholders to expect massive lawsuits for injury and disease in the near future and it is already being removed from schools because it's making children sick. In other words the wireless industry is already collapsing and the wireless paradigm is already a 'dead duck'........ even as it continues to be marketed as the future of everything.
If wireless did NOT have such potential for surveillance and effortless control of society it would have already been ditched. The technocrats are just as addicted to this technology as the average consumer.
Nobody wants to admit the truth - that it is so toxic it must all be dumped into a giant skip.
The technocrats want to replace everything natural with artificial versions. Robot bees, robot workers, robot police, robot dogs, robot cashiers, robot everything. For them the toxicity of wireless is killing two birds with one stone (literally).
It will be up to the consumer to throw their toxic gadgets away, as many are already doing. Eventually (and not too far away) wireless will be regarded like smoking. A dirty, filthy, selfish habit which has no place in public spaces..... or anywhere where biological life exists.
The frequency of electromagnetic signals is critically important when determining their level of hazard, while being almost completely ignored by all those decrying those hazards. Additionally, none of the experts seem to have ever heard of the inverse square law and its relevance. Those wishing to learn more about both of these factors should watch eng.unimelb.edu.au/engage-with-us/lectures/davis-2015