All real progress depends upon the unreasonable person.

-author known, and a helluva lot smarter than I.

Expand full comment
Jan 22Liked by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

"The medical community and the media hang their hats on the use of ‘double-blind, placebo-controlled, peer-reviewed studies..." The full results of Pfizer's initial trials will be available, I understand, in about 75 years. Fair enough. I am willing to consider taking their injection - in 75 years...

As to the scam of peer review, ha. I have had peer reviewers claim that my papers said things they did not say, or completely misunderstand the argument, or outright insult me.

A couple of years ago, a friend of mine, a retired doctor, sent me a paper published in the 1980s, I think, making the case that a good many journal reviewers are sociopaths...

The best experience was about one year ago with the publication of a major paper by public health professors at two major universities. They breathlessly discovered that, contrary to hopes and expectations, international data revealed that higher rates of COVID injections did not reduce new case rates of COVID. What a disappointment!

I examined their data and ran an elementary statistical analysis, the type that I teach in college. In fact, the data were far more powerful than the authors admitted. Their data proved that higher rates of COVID injections were strongly statistically associated with higher case rates of COVID. The relationship was not negative; it was not neutral; it was strongly positive!

Why wouldn't they state the obvious conclusion? I wrote to the lead author and got no reply. Surprise!

Very well. I wrote a one-page letter to the editor of the journal, pointing to the much bigger conclusion they had under their noses. They replied quickly (unusual in academic publishing), telling me that they would not publish my letter, and in addition, by an incredible miracle, they were able to determine that no other journal in their vast publishing empire (one of the biggest on earth) would publish my letter either.

I found a much smaller and friendlier publisher, a fellow Substacker, a doctor dedicated to the truth. The journal is obscure. My college is happy that I have another publication; no one has read it, of course.

I look forward to the next installment!

Expand full comment

As far as the ethical trap disallowing testing a vaccine against placebo...can't there at least be a study vetting the assumed placebo? That is focus the test on the placebo. Shoot one could say its for looking for superior adjuvants and simply have the antigen free version of the vaccine compared against a saline one and go from there. Implications will be if the experimental arm, the proxy of the placebo for vaccine trials, does worse than a saline solution, then all vaccine trials built on these failed placebos will need to be re-run. Perhaps we'll get a decent baseline of the rate of chronic disease onset along the way.

Expand full comment

hi Dr Tenpenny. thank you. this has helped me to understand the Immunogenicity, efficacy and effectiveness section in Canada’s Immunization Guide. it seemed to be saying that the antibodies aren’t known to protect against infection... it might be a very truthful admission from government: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/healthy-living/canadian-immunization-guide-part-4-active-vaccines/page-26-covid-19-vaccine.html#a4

Expand full comment

Yes I had a Pharmd explain to me last year just b4 the mandates (Aug '21) hit that it was unethical to deny those in the control group from getting the vaxx. I knew we were in deep crap at that point and they were intending to eliminate the control group not just in trials but society at large.

Expand full comment

I’ve said this so many times already and I’ll say it again...and again:

When will people do historical research and find out that anytime you inject anything into your body, you’re on a highway to hell.

NEVER in the history of mankind has injecting poisons into your body given you better health.

Quite the opposite. They’ve ALL maimed and killed. Read and learn the history of this barbaric act:

The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccinations https://a.co/d/cfvx9Q6

Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History https://a.co/d/coVuit4

- George William Winterburn, PhD, MD, The Value of Vaccination: A Non-partisan Review of Its History and Results, 1886

- History and Pathology of Vaccination, Edgar R. Crookshank, 1889

- Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination. A Strange Chapter of Medical History, 1889


There are many others, they’re just a few.

Finding the truth isn’t that hard

But you do have to get off your ass and turn off the tube and read.

We’ve known for well over 150 years the concept of vaccination is a fraud concept.

And the criminals that pose as our elected officials are in on the take and are raking in millions, and will NEVER stop the madness that is called vaccination.

And neither will doctors who are being PAID handsomely for jabbing and lying to their trusting patients.

If you’ve been jabbed then your death will be influenced by and/or directly caused by said jab.

People should quit thinking it’s coincidence. That’s propaganda talk.

And yet the populace of today (being dumbed down by design) have their heads buried in the sand and believe the corrupt media’s story of blaming these deaths on everything else under the sun except the obvious. What a pity.

And those “doctors” who are shilling for the medical cartel, the pharmafia and allopathic medicine should hang their heads in shame.

They know the truth, but have sold their soul to the company because their payment on their yacht, McMansion, and jag is due.


Sickening, pathetic and pitiful.

Expand full comment

As always, very well written Dr. T! A great education for the lay person re/ DBPC/PR studies & also an informative education on the history of said studies and equally important the human immune system, and how the immune system (humeral and more importantly innate) impacts the relevance of said studies. Bravo!

Expand full comment

After I read this report (linked below) from a group in Italy, I believe that the pharmaceutical companies are poisoning people on purpose.

It was written in 2016-2017. The group tested many different vaccines from multiple pharmaceutical companies to try to figure out why some people have adverse events.

They tested flu, meningitis, tetanus, HPV, etc..and were very surprised to find toxic chemicals and heavy metals in ALL of the vaccines. Many of those same chemicals have been found in the covid "vaccines."

Our FDA and CDC have looked the other way for decades and allowed this. It is criminal and I believe it's intentional. It's no wonder we have a tremendous rise in autoimmune diseases and deaths..


Expand full comment

I’ve followed you for years. Even had your original vaccination tapes on VHS. I cringe each time I hear, “I am against the Covid jabs, but am for all other vaccines.

They just aren’t up to date on your offerings, right? I am proud of those who have opened eyes, have researched, and now understand that the ‘idea’ of vaccines might be ‘good’, but that in reality, it just ain’t so. You can’t improve our God given immunity.

Expand full comment

Dr. T, you were one of the first to open my eyes to the truth on this subject. I had seen reactions to "anti-vaxxers" before that, and had noticed how disproportionate they were, but never thought past that. You got me thinking and researching. Many thanks.

Expand full comment

Bless you Dr Tenpenny. Thank you for this post.

You've stood so firm for so long, against the onslaught defending the indefensible.

Mankind needs to step up & honour your tenacity integrity & honesty.

Expand full comment

You are wrong. The Earth is Flat. The evidence is overwhelming. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Dr. Tenpenny. This explains sooo much! #micdrop

Expand full comment

Dr. TenPenny:

I am on the lookout for articles/essays I can share with my daughters-in-law, my nurse-daughter, my nurse friend, and my public health nurse co-mother-in-law. This article met the criteria. It is clear. It is about all vaccines, not just the Covid19 vaccines (better yet, it is about the vaccine approach to a complex immune system that doesn't rely just on antibodies). It is written by a doctor. It looks at the history of the past 200 years. It brought up the placebo problem, which is new to me. Even if some of my vaccinated daughters don't agree with all your points, they have to start thinking about the placebo problem, which is a reason to distrust the way studies are done. I can't send more than one or two things per year in order not to seem like I want to pick a fight. So, I have to choose carefully. This is the one for 2023. Thank you for all your research! But, having read your recent post in Walking with God, please do take time off from this battle every week. Even if just for a few hours. It will please God. It will refresh you for further battle/research. May God bless your efforts.

Expand full comment

This is really good thank you. One thing that struck me was the unreasoning 'bias for action' or I should say bias for intervention. Any medical intervention should be understood to have some danger and must be weighed against the default of 'no intervention'.

'First, Do no harm' presumes the high likelihood of interventions being harmful. 'Do nothing' or 'Wait' is very often the correct move but it never puts money in healthcare's pocket or creates medical dependency.

Expand full comment

Thank you for one more data point that only reinforces my distrust of the entire medical system. I will still use it, but only after doing my own "due diligence." Exception would be made for emergencies.

Expand full comment