I read Dr Ana's posts often, but those who write daily LONNNG substacks? It's like drinking from a fire hose. That's why I write one substack PER WEEK
BTW - This isn't about her work which everyone seems to want to tell me about. I respect what she does, but I wrote this substack in defense to that the MSM has been smearing me with for more than two years: I believe there are legitimate reasons for those magnetic pictures.
Dear Sherri Tenpenny, Thank you for being on Substack! I am a grandmother and I, like so many readers, gasp for air often when I read Substack, My heartbeat goes up, I feel dread and often I go to bed wounded, exasperated, thinking about the children and grandchildren.
Interesting comment, Piki. I understand, really I do - and I sometimes feel like that myself. Keep focused on the Lord. It's really all that matters. Proverbs 22:6 - Train up a child in the way he should go; when he is old, he will not depart from it.
National Science and Technology Council 1999 report: Nanotechnology Research Directions
Please go to Ch. 8 p. 107-110. From p. 109: "Using biological systems as a model, scientists are attempting to build ever more complex systems that are capable of self-assembly....Spider silk is one of the strongest materials known. Its molecular structure is being used to design better composite polymer systems of increasing strength and utility." Spiderman.
Also on p. 109: "Nanoparticles considerably smaller than one micron in diameter have been used in
revolutionary ways to deliver drugs and genes into cells." Back in 1999 they were using nano to transfect. How much gene mod of God's creation have they done by now?!
"The particles can be combined with chemical compounds that are ordinarily insoluble and difficult for cells to internalize. The derivatized particles can then be introduced into the bloodstream with
little possibility of clogging the capillaries and other small blood vessels, as in the case of
insoluble powders." Uh ... don't think that's going to well.
Cont's on to p. 110: "The precise pattern and periodicity of the tiles can be modified by altering DNA sequence, allowing the formation of specific lattices with programmable structures and features at a nanometer scale. This approach has the potential to lead to the use of designed DNA crystals as scaffolds for the crystallization of macromolecules, as materials for use as catalysts, as molecular sieves, or as scaffolds for the assembly of molecular electronic components or biochips in DNA-based computers." Think that should do it for the naysayers re. "biochips."
Pg. 110: "Devices that are currently in use to control the interactions of DNA on surfaces can have
broader applications for controlling nanoassembly. These devices use electric fields to control the movement of particles toward or away from microscopic sites on the device surface. Charged biological molecules (DNA, RNA, protein) and analytes, cells, and other nanoscale or microscale charged particles can be precisely organized." Electric fields ... like all of the "G's" ... 2/3/4/5G & on into 6/7G.
262 page doc FULL of MUCH detail. Suggest saving a copy before it disappears. Part of the long term Nat. Science Foundation Nat. Nano Initiative.
People I know have laughed at the magnet theory, but their reasoning is flawed because they tried sticking something heavy on their arm.
This won't work cause gravity is stronger on a heavy object.
I used a small 1/2 inch circle of magnetic automotive door sign material on a friend and ZAP, it stuck and he still didn't believe me. He said I put glue on it. I proved there was no glue because it didn't stick elsewhere and he still was in denial.
What I am most curious about is these videos of spinners dying from a 5G phone being used by or near them.
The claim is that 5G is amplified to penetrate into large concrete or steel buildings to reach the phone.
I bought a new phone recently and made sure it was only 4G. Don't want to chance killing a nearby guinea pig!
When I've seen those "spinners" my first thought was something was in their brain, near their 11th cranial nerve that supplies the sternocleidomastoid muscle (which makes your head turn to the side) - and that something "external" was stimulating it - and also causing a seizure. I have no proof of this - just watched dozens of those videos and assessed them anatomically.
Sad to watch. They seem to as all look high over their right shoulder, spin and drop dead instantly. Many people say that it is all an act to make a video. They fall to hard on concrete floors for it to be an act.
Gee, after all this assuming that the flood of note pads, pens, and other promotional things seen in many doctors' waiting rooms, along with pharmaceutical industry propaganda in television, radio, and magazine ads, we are now to believe that it is all meant to educate the physicians who seldom if ever get any of their information from those sources, preferring to receive it on lavish cruises hosted by eye candy pharmaceutical reps?
You might try looking up the differences among diamagnetic, paramagnetic, and ferromagnetic materials. Graphene oxide does not exhibit significant ferromagnetism and microgram quantities of it, placed under the skin, have no chance of creating the strong magnetic field required for heavy steel objects to stick. You would need a fairly large neodymium magnet surgically placed under the skin to do this. If graphene oxide could do what neodymium magnets do, we would be making electric motors out of graphene and would not be reliant on China to mine the rare earths.
So I’m filing the magnetism of the shots under “easily disprovable theories mixed in with legitimate concerns in order to discredit truth-tellers”.
Could someone then please build a functional electric motor with no permanent magnets except graphene oxide? (Use all the water you want if that helps)
Why zero in on all this improbable and unimportant stuff, instead of focusing on actionable, important information like evidence of all the vaccine harms?
Why waste the precious, fragile credibility of the vaccine-skeptical movement on speculation about some steel sticking to people's skin? (That sounds uncomfortable, by the way)
Build a lab in your garage and prove that the stuff is a powerful ferromagnetic material! Show it works, don't sit at your keyboard and overthink. Then make a video and we'll all watch. Good luck!!
Just so we understand exactly what you are saying: do you deny that any vaccinees have experienced magnetic phenomena (magnets sticking to the skin over their injection sites) after injection? Is that correct? Are you alleging that all of the testimonials and videos alleging magnetism after CV19 injection are fraudulent?
MAC requests have been found in Grocery store Meats, Milk, Yogurts and other foods, not enough people got the Vax, so foods will be used to get the Nano Tech in people's bodies.
I follow a practitioner, Dr Ana also, and her focus is not on graphene, but on the hydrogel. After listening to her, the hydrogel is most worrisome to me. Many of the ingredients are toxic, but the hydrogel is what is causing the big rubbery 'clots' pulled out of the veins. She has done a lot of examination and experimenting on vaccinated and unvaccinated blood and finds hydrogel in both. She uses EDTA chelation, but it does not remove the hydrogel, but temporarily lowers it, in both vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.
It has been over 18 months since Campra first reported his findings of graphene oxide in multiple vials utilizing micro-Raman spectroscopy. Other researchers have reported extremely similar findings (see Dr. Tenpenny's above summary of Dr. Young's work), yet no credible research group, using the same materials and methods have published a detailed report which contradicts Campra's findings. I find that extremely significant/suspicious.
*Polymer Hydrogels: polymer (repetitive macromolecular units) hydrogels (mixtures of solid and liquid [of porous, permeable solids and at least 10% by weight or volume of interstitial fluid composed completely or mainly by water] usually in the form of an emulsion or gel) can either be composed of physical/chemical and natural or synthetic substances. Some of the natural substances include hyaluronic acid, chitosan, heparin, alginate, gelatin, and fibrin. Natural polymer hydrogels are intrinsically more biocompatible (less toxic/irritating).
One of the synthetic polymer hydrogel components is PEG (polyethylene glycol), a disclosed substance in Pfizer's product which is known to be irritating/toxic at least in some humans which has been born-out by instances of severe anaphylaxis after administration. Others include polyvinyl alcohol, polyacrylate, and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP).
It's my understanding the many, if not all, of the research groups have been threatened into silence and submission. I seem to recall that it's not legal to even do the testing on these vials. (read that a while back)
Yes, that point has been repeatedly stressed by Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova among others. The fact that it is illegal to independently analyze the vial contents is not only totally unprecedented but highly suggestive of a massive attempt (conspiracy) to keep the contents a well-guarded secret, for which there is no benign explanation.
Thank you for your expertise and for bringing together these citations ~ a very much needed focus on this GO thread, too often surprisingly disregarded and diminished (in the past, for example derision by some toward La Quinta Columna for reasons not readily evident). These things lesser known should be magnified, not dismissed, but instead more closely analyzed, applying critical thinking (pun intended ~ love your Thursday shows). Thank you so much for all you do Dr. Tenpenny.
I read Dr Ana's posts often, but those who write daily LONNNG substacks? It's like drinking from a fire hose. That's why I write one substack PER WEEK
BTW - This isn't about her work which everyone seems to want to tell me about. I respect what she does, but I wrote this substack in defense to that the MSM has been smearing me with for more than two years: I believe there are legitimate reasons for those magnetic pictures.
Dear Sherri Tenpenny, Thank you for being on Substack! I am a grandmother and I, like so many readers, gasp for air often when I read Substack, My heartbeat goes up, I feel dread and often I go to bed wounded, exasperated, thinking about the children and grandchildren.
Interesting comment, Piki. I understand, really I do - and I sometimes feel like that myself. Keep focused on the Lord. It's really all that matters. Proverbs 22:6 - Train up a child in the way he should go; when he is old, he will not depart from it.
Thank you for citing my article!
We know the vaccines were also contaminated with steel particles that were attracted to magnets.
And magnetic beads may have been used in mRNA vaccine production.
https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/industrial/pharma-biopharma/nucleic-acid-therapeutic-development-solutions/mrna-therapeutic-resources/mrna-synthesis-reagents/magnetic-beads-mrna-production.html#mrna-production-solutions-quality-requirements
https://truthsocial.com/group/trump-forever/statuses/110653572600221641
Apologizes it was Truth Social Dr. Tenpenny.
I just watched. Video on RUMBLE, where a magnet was attaching to Walmarts beef products
Dear Dr Tenpenny.
We did much work on this subject and made several short films.
The v-induced magnetism was verified by doctors.
We also made a national warning emailing every UK surgery concering the magnetism we were witnessing and documenting and MRIs.
The films can be seen here: www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetism
It would be great to make contact.
Best wishes
Mark Playne
Not On The Beeb
I appreciate and admire everything you said to the Ohio Health Committee in June 2021. I uploaded the video in Sept. 2021 and people still watch:
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny to Ohio Health Committee: "Enact Vax Choice and Anti-Discrimination Act"
https://youtu.be/PSpxdwNQRwc
Thanks Dr. T. Fascinating & alarming article.
Sorry ... forgot the link: file:///C:/Users/Gateway%20User/Documents/Bountiful%20Living/ADVOCACY%20WORK/Vaccines/CV/nano/NNI/research_directions_1999.pdf
National Science and Technology Council 1999 report: Nanotechnology Research Directions
Please go to Ch. 8 p. 107-110. From p. 109: "Using biological systems as a model, scientists are attempting to build ever more complex systems that are capable of self-assembly....Spider silk is one of the strongest materials known. Its molecular structure is being used to design better composite polymer systems of increasing strength and utility." Spiderman.
Also on p. 109: "Nanoparticles considerably smaller than one micron in diameter have been used in
revolutionary ways to deliver drugs and genes into cells." Back in 1999 they were using nano to transfect. How much gene mod of God's creation have they done by now?!
"The particles can be combined with chemical compounds that are ordinarily insoluble and difficult for cells to internalize. The derivatized particles can then be introduced into the bloodstream with
little possibility of clogging the capillaries and other small blood vessels, as in the case of
insoluble powders." Uh ... don't think that's going to well.
Cont's on to p. 110: "The precise pattern and periodicity of the tiles can be modified by altering DNA sequence, allowing the formation of specific lattices with programmable structures and features at a nanometer scale. This approach has the potential to lead to the use of designed DNA crystals as scaffolds for the crystallization of macromolecules, as materials for use as catalysts, as molecular sieves, or as scaffolds for the assembly of molecular electronic components or biochips in DNA-based computers." Think that should do it for the naysayers re. "biochips."
Pg. 110: "Devices that are currently in use to control the interactions of DNA on surfaces can have
broader applications for controlling nanoassembly. These devices use electric fields to control the movement of particles toward or away from microscopic sites on the device surface. Charged biological molecules (DNA, RNA, protein) and analytes, cells, and other nanoscale or microscale charged particles can be precisely organized." Electric fields ... like all of the "G's" ... 2/3/4/5G & on into 6/7G.
262 page doc FULL of MUCH detail. Suggest saving a copy before it disappears. Part of the long term Nat. Science Foundation Nat. Nano Initiative.
Thank You for writing this.
People I know have laughed at the magnet theory, but their reasoning is flawed because they tried sticking something heavy on their arm.
This won't work cause gravity is stronger on a heavy object.
I used a small 1/2 inch circle of magnetic automotive door sign material on a friend and ZAP, it stuck and he still didn't believe me. He said I put glue on it. I proved there was no glue because it didn't stick elsewhere and he still was in denial.
What I am most curious about is these videos of spinners dying from a 5G phone being used by or near them.
The claim is that 5G is amplified to penetrate into large concrete or steel buildings to reach the phone.
I bought a new phone recently and made sure it was only 4G. Don't want to chance killing a nearby guinea pig!
When I've seen those "spinners" my first thought was something was in their brain, near their 11th cranial nerve that supplies the sternocleidomastoid muscle (which makes your head turn to the side) - and that something "external" was stimulating it - and also causing a seizure. I have no proof of this - just watched dozens of those videos and assessed them anatomically.
Sad to watch. They seem to as all look high over their right shoulder, spin and drop dead instantly. Many people say that it is all an act to make a video. They fall to hard on concrete floors for it to be an act.
Gee, after all this assuming that the flood of note pads, pens, and other promotional things seen in many doctors' waiting rooms, along with pharmaceutical industry propaganda in television, radio, and magazine ads, we are now to believe that it is all meant to educate the physicians who seldom if ever get any of their information from those sources, preferring to receive it on lavish cruises hosted by eye candy pharmaceutical reps?
haha! great comment!
I wish that Substack would return to the thread so I could see it.
You might try looking up the differences among diamagnetic, paramagnetic, and ferromagnetic materials. Graphene oxide does not exhibit significant ferromagnetism and microgram quantities of it, placed under the skin, have no chance of creating the strong magnetic field required for heavy steel objects to stick. You would need a fairly large neodymium magnet surgically placed under the skin to do this. If graphene oxide could do what neodymium magnets do, we would be making electric motors out of graphene and would not be reliant on China to mine the rare earths.
So I’m filing the magnetism of the shots under “easily disprovable theories mixed in with legitimate concerns in order to discredit truth-tellers”.
Could someone then please build a functional electric motor with no permanent magnets except graphene oxide? (Use all the water you want if that helps)
Why zero in on all this improbable and unimportant stuff, instead of focusing on actionable, important information like evidence of all the vaccine harms?
Why waste the precious, fragile credibility of the vaccine-skeptical movement on speculation about some steel sticking to people's skin? (That sounds uncomfortable, by the way)
Build a lab in your garage and prove that the stuff is a powerful ferromagnetic material! Show it works, don't sit at your keyboard and overthink. Then make a video and we'll all watch. Good luck!!
I'm going to write a substack in the future about nanomagnatism in medicine.
Just so we understand exactly what you are saying: do you deny that any vaccinees have experienced magnetic phenomena (magnets sticking to the skin over their injection sites) after injection? Is that correct? Are you alleging that all of the testimonials and videos alleging magnetism after CV19 injection are fraudulent?
Are you familiar with Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD research? You may want to add her to your list of sources. She is only one that I have been getting info from. She is full time research and treatment, and not funded. https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
I've already commented on this. thank you.
MAC requests have been found in Grocery store Meats, Milk, Yogurts and other foods, not enough people got the Vax, so foods will be used to get the Nano Tech in people's bodies.
I follow a practitioner, Dr Ana also, and her focus is not on graphene, but on the hydrogel. After listening to her, the hydrogel is most worrisome to me. Many of the ingredients are toxic, but the hydrogel is what is causing the big rubbery 'clots' pulled out of the veins. She has done a lot of examination and experimenting on vaccinated and unvaccinated blood and finds hydrogel in both. She uses EDTA chelation, but it does not remove the hydrogel, but temporarily lowers it, in both vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.
FYI: Hydrogel* is not one-size fits all. There are many iterations of it.
The question is, what hydrogel formulae are used in the CV19 platforms? Does it include GFN's or not? Unfortunately, 2.5 years after the global roll-out, we still don't have that information in the public domain. So far, I have not yet seen a cogent, detailed, critique of the work of Dr. Pablo Campra (a short review of his past work at https://lorphicweb.com/dr-pablo-campra-reports-that-graphene-oxide-has-now-been-proved-to-exist-in-4-trademark-vaccines-by-micro-raman-spectroscopy/) or Ricardo Delgado of LQC, most recently presented at https://rumble.com/v2fsxne-conference-of-la-quinta-columna-the-game-is-over.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email and this” Nano Technology Used in Bioweapon Shots (rumble.com).
It has been over 18 months since Campra first reported his findings of graphene oxide in multiple vials utilizing micro-Raman spectroscopy. Other researchers have reported extremely similar findings (see Dr. Tenpenny's above summary of Dr. Young's work), yet no credible research group, using the same materials and methods have published a detailed report which contradicts Campra's findings. I find that extremely significant/suspicious.
*Polymer Hydrogels: polymer (repetitive macromolecular units) hydrogels (mixtures of solid and liquid [of porous, permeable solids and at least 10% by weight or volume of interstitial fluid composed completely or mainly by water] usually in the form of an emulsion or gel) can either be composed of physical/chemical and natural or synthetic substances. Some of the natural substances include hyaluronic acid, chitosan, heparin, alginate, gelatin, and fibrin. Natural polymer hydrogels are intrinsically more biocompatible (less toxic/irritating).
One of the synthetic polymer hydrogel components is PEG (polyethylene glycol), a disclosed substance in Pfizer's product which is known to be irritating/toxic at least in some humans which has been born-out by instances of severe anaphylaxis after administration. Others include polyvinyl alcohol, polyacrylate, and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP).
It's my understanding the many, if not all, of the research groups have been threatened into silence and submission. I seem to recall that it's not legal to even do the testing on these vials. (read that a while back)
Yes, that point has been repeatedly stressed by Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova among others. The fact that it is illegal to independently analyze the vial contents is not only totally unprecedented but highly suggestive of a massive attempt (conspiracy) to keep the contents a well-guarded secret, for which there is no benign explanation.
Thank you for your expertise and for bringing together these citations ~ a very much needed focus on this GO thread, too often surprisingly disregarded and diminished (in the past, for example derision by some toward La Quinta Columna for reasons not readily evident). These things lesser known should be magnified, not dismissed, but instead more closely analyzed, applying critical thinking (pun intended ~ love your Thursday shows). Thank you so much for all you do Dr. Tenpenny.