Hello Everyone! First, thank you so much for your readership, your kind comments, for your ‘shares’, and for those of you who have become Paid Supporters, a huge colossal hug! I am working on several substacks right now that are quite long because there is a lot of information to share. Please help me to serve you better. Thank you in advance!
I wanted to say that some of us are reading quite a few articles every day now so ONE article is better so we don't lose track of the other installments!
I receive lots of sub stacks daily, and it’s my preference to have one long one that I can refer back to rather than more “chunks” which are harder to keep track of the more one’s emails fill up. THANK YOU for invaluable information, either way. You are much appreciated and admired!
We are all dealing with masses of new information and really appreciate your clear writing and clarity of thinking. A single long article at least keeps everything on one topic in a place where we can file/bookmark & return if necessary. I completely understand people choosing smaller dollops tho!
I genuinely look forward to seeing what you have to say and thank you from the bottom of my heart for sharing much needed erudition on matters some of us have been completely ignorant of.
Agree with the smaller chunks being better, unfortunately I have a tendency to miss subsequent parts because they either get lost in my spam or end up at the bottom of my Inbox and I never get to it before the next part comes out.
I prefer condensed. If I need to verify from disbelief or numbheadedness, a link is beneficial. Something similar to a subscript that surrenders validity. There are hundreds of reads daily, yet only 24 hours of time. I would wager that posts that offered meat would draw more to the table.
I chose one long one however my preference would be two or three smaller ones…
The reason I chose one long one is I would be afraid of missing important content. One long one would ensure I would get all the information on the subject matter.
Here's an example:
>I did 4-part series on Colonoscopies - if that was one long substack, it would have been more than 10,000 words.
>the "evaluating Vaccine Safety Trials" that questioned placebos. It was the longest substack I have posted at >3000 words.
Remember you can search the archives of any substack you read and/or subscribe to on Eye on the Evidence, even if it's just a free subscription.
I personally won't read long posts - but I'm trying to see what most of you like the best!
Some of us are reading dozens of Substack articles every day now, so smaller chunks is better, IMO.
I wanted to say that some of us are reading quite a few articles every day now so ONE article is better so we don't lose track of the other installments!
Very good.
Luc
GOD bless you Dr. T - you give me HOPE ...
Over Here, I am flexible.
I receive lots of sub stacks daily, and it’s my preference to have one long one that I can refer back to rather than more “chunks” which are harder to keep track of the more one’s emails fill up. THANK YOU for invaluable information, either way. You are much appreciated and admired!
Thank you for your courage, a fine example of what is possible with ethics, research and commitment to the truth.
I like 1 article....I print out and take time to read!
We are all dealing with masses of new information and really appreciate your clear writing and clarity of thinking. A single long article at least keeps everything on one topic in a place where we can file/bookmark & return if necessary. I completely understand people choosing smaller dollops tho!
I genuinely look forward to seeing what you have to say and thank you from the bottom of my heart for sharing much needed erudition on matters some of us have been completely ignorant of.
Anything and anyway you care to do it, Dr. Tenpenny.
Definitely 2 or 3 installments.
While I voted for 2-3 segments, after reading comments I now lean towards one long one. So many good points made.
I save a lot In Evernote so 1 article would definitely simplify.
Agree with the smaller chunks being better, unfortunately I have a tendency to miss subsequent parts because they either get lost in my spam or end up at the bottom of my Inbox and I never get to it before the next part comes out.
I prefer condensed. If I need to verify from disbelief or numbheadedness, a link is beneficial. Something similar to a subscript that surrenders validity. There are hundreds of reads daily, yet only 24 hours of time. I would wager that posts that offered meat would draw more to the table.
I chose one long one however my preference would be two or three smaller ones…
The reason I chose one long one is I would be afraid of missing important content. One long one would ensure I would get all the information on the subject matter.