95 Comments
User's avatar
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny's avatar

Did you watch any part of these two hearings? I agree with you. I wanted to throw a shoe at my computer screen when the Democratic senators got started with their pontification. This an opportunity for them to "show off" for their constituents; it's free air time for their next campaign IMO. They read a script and defend it, most likely from their handlers.

I've watched more hearings since January than I have in my entire life. They are the same, and they are mostly disgusting. Only a few Representatives and Senators seem interested in what any of the witnesses have to say. They are mostly there to scold and shame the person sitting in front of them. It's a circus. And THESE ARE THE PEOPLE who have spent us into oblivion and made the laws to RULE us.

People should watch a few and write down the names of the people on the committees for the next voting cycle. The mid-terms are coming and hopefully this will help guide your votes. We have no control over stolen elections, but at least we can try.

Expand full comment
R W's avatar

Does the MMR contain fetal debris and DNA? There has been much “yes and no it doesn’t” in the media.

Expand full comment
Randy's avatar

Here's some "light" reading for you:

https://vaccineingredients.net/vaccines/mmr-mmr-ii

Expand full comment
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny's avatar

yes it does contain residual DNA from the aborted fetal cells used for the rubella fraction of the vaccine.

Expand full comment
Carolyn's avatar

Thank you for this info

People have to understand ALL vaccines are bad. None have been tested correctly.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

Cassidy shoots himself in the foot by adding some vaccines are tested against previous versions. It does not take an expert to know that testing against a previous version is NOT testing against a placebo.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

William Morgan Cassidy, his full name, anagrams to

- I am criminal gold sways

The love of money is the root of all kinds of evil.

Expand full comment
Randy's avatar

I have those lists of vaccine ingredients on my computer. I definitely have confidence in "vaccines". I am confident that they do nothing to improve a person's health. They do; however, injure and kill people by the millions! What I find most interesting, is that these entities TARGET pregnant women, the elderly and people with comorbidities. There's a word that comes to mind here: MURDER! For those who don't know Canada very well; we have a program called MAID (Medical Assistance In Dying). They really should call things what they truly are.

Expand full comment
TruthGleaner's avatar

Another egregious display of "Poli-trick-nology" to obfuscate the truth and benefit the "Medical Cartel!!!" What else can We The People expect from our "Public Serpents!!!"

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

Serpents indeed. I see senators anagrams to these two single words

- assentor

- treasons

Expand full comment
Randy's avatar

"Public Serpents!!!". That fits perfectly!

Expand full comment
Cynthia Whiteman's avatar

Do they not use Robert’s rules of order? Could we not implement an independent person to run the meeting? I liked the comment about turning off the mike so any person, not just RFK could answer the question.

God bless you and the others who are trying to get us back on track, the way God would have us.

Expand full comment
Fakefalsetruth's avatar

Science has never scientifically proven the existence of so called "viruses" in the real world so zero justification for any vaccine designed allegedly to give immunity to a virus. Simple really.

Expand full comment
Lenmor1776's avatar

Not only are the vaccines tested against a bogus placebo, most of the current drugs such as Elaquis for blood clotting and Statins, as well as blood pressure meds.

Expand full comment
M A Markiewicz's avatar

Thank you for investing the time necessary to determine the placebo components. I have not a met a medical colleague yet who knew these components are NOT subject to safety studies. GRAS designation has misguided all who thought it meant approval of safety.

Expand full comment
M A Markiewicz's avatar

Why aren't those in the hearings required to state conflicts of interest?

Expand full comment
Mary's avatar

Unfrickin real! Insanity!

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

The kid gets the quackzine fever then gets the NSAID then - WOOSH - mush brain. Like a binary weapon.

Everybody knows that the kid is out of the womb only because the pelvis is too narrow; the baby brain is still undergoing embryogenesis until puberty. So this idea to inject heavy metals while artificially inducing a fever & throwing in a potentially organ-devouring prostaglandin inhibitor is totally crazy - if not criminally insane - take your pick.

Expand full comment
Marjory's avatar

I hate these so called hearings. Kennedy tried his best, but apparently these senators have no respect for anyone including their constituents. They worship lobbyists and money.

Expand full comment
JudyMarie's avatar

Maybe these politicians would understand by using an analogy, as an example: studying the safety of whiskey using vodka as a placebo rather than water. This might be simple enough for them to understand.

Expand full comment
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny's avatar

that's a good one~ I may use that!!!!

Expand full comment
Terry Daly's avatar

It’s frustrating to see these elected officials asking questions only then to pontificate the answers they want the public to hear. Why do they even ask anyone to testify? They want to point fingers at administrators that have been on the job for 4 months when many of these interrogators have been in D. C. for years, if not decades. And what are the results of THEIR incompetence: massive debt, corruption, crime, chronic disease and decay. God forbid that we make some real changes to reverse to trend.

Expand full comment
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny's avatar

GREAT comment, Terry! thank you

Expand full comment