17 Comments
User's avatar
Mike A.'s avatar

In Epoch Times today (Mar31) there's an article about Sureme Court striking down a conversion therapy ban Appeals Court decision in Colorado. Whatever your thoughts on that, it includes a very interesting quote from Gorsuch that points very favorably toward your dirty dozen case! From the article:

----

The Colorado law “censors speech based on viewpoint,” Gorsuch said, and “Colorado may regard its policy as essential to public health and safety.”

“Certainly, censorious governments throughout history have believed the same. But the First Amendment stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country,” he said.

“It reflects instead a judgment that every American possesses an inalienable right to think and speak freely, and a faith in the free marketplace of ideas as the best means for discovering truth.”

----

His whole statement is very favorable to how they might rule for you! In your case, it's not a direct law of course, but still very favorable to the intention behind it.

Tammy G.'s avatar

Well I will for all of to come to Jesus and be born Again! I used to follow you, but when you put a Freemason on your telegram show….my discernment kicked in! Blasphemy! Your information on the shots were interesting! We are in a spiritual war and my money is going to Jesus….Amen!

FreedomFighter's avatar

Go get 'em, Dr. T. To this day I still feel revulsion over our own government (enslavement) and its refusal to abide by the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights [which exists because the Founding Fathers felt the necessity of reminding future leaders of the unalienable rights of the citizenry]. Victory in this court action will be as important as any regarding freedom.

Best of luck, for you, the infamous twelve and the American people.

Freedom Fox's avatar

Here's them telling us how they studied us in 2020, how we communicated rock-solid science that challenged their false narratives. Using this study they enacted censorship protocols in 2021. Not because we were wrong. But because we were right, we were persuasive, we had the better arguments. But they had their story and they were sticking to it. Needing to silence us because their narrative was too fragile:

Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox

Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science Online

MIT, January 20, 3021

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.07993.pdf

Study was about masking, plandemic "skeptics" being so adept at real science that our information we share is of the caliber and quality to be published in leading scientific magazines. That we're smart, capable, intelligent, not the Neanderthal's they imagined us to be. That we are effective communicators, use visualizations (e.g. memes, graphs) that resonate with readers.

All good stuff, right? Until they identify all of these positive attributes and conclude they have to try to discredit us (mock, denigrate, shame), censor us, declare us "domestic threats" for our "dangerous dis/mal/misinformation" threatening the "cognitive infrastructure" of the nation, a national security threat as declared by CISA five-six years ago, not retracted as policy. They even through in a section about the J6 #FakeNews "Insurrection" as it was going to print to shore up their claims that "skeptics" are especially dangerous to the national security. Note that Kate Starbird is a listed as a contributor to the study, funded by both the NSF and NAS.

CISA's declarations that our "cognitive infrastructure," aka, our personal thoughts, ideas and beliefs, are a threat to the nation that needs to be "mitigated," i.e. Censored. Raised to threat level by insinuating foreign malign origins, but no line of demarcation exists between foreign malign origins and domestic:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220221213323/https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/cisa_insight_mitigating_foreign_influence_508.pdf

https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/June%202022%20CSAC%20Recommendations%20%E2%80%93%20MDM_0.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htRlU0JKdGg

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23A243/284490/20231010122124243_2023-10-10%20-%20Murthy%20v.%20Missouri%20-%20Response%20to%20Governments%20Third%20Supplemental%20Brief%20-%20Final.pdf

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/cisa-staff-report6-26-23.pdf

Freedom Fox's avatar

About those viral visualizations in the MIT study that "skeptics" are good at using.

This is evidence of a manipulated and edited, rewritten archived official CDC 2007 Pre-pandemic Planning Guide. The link is to the current, available online version of this official CDC document. A document that I also downloaded in September, 2020. Downloaded then because I noticed it already had been edited and rewritten between then and when I first viewed the Guide in April-May, 2020. Isn't altering an official, archived government document illegal? The .jpg links below show two of the several charts in the Guide that had data removed. Data that demonstrated in an easy-to-read visual format that even in a Spanish Flu-level pandemic the restrictions and mandates CDC have been recommending for CV are excessive and unnecessary. Effective visualizations that expose the CDC's bad faith. How can this be legal? An effective, authoritative visualization that showed the plandemic response was over-the-top, unwarranted. Rewritten, edited, censored, because it was being used effectively to counter official narratives.

Interim Pre-pandemic Planning Guidance:

Community Strategy for Pandemic Influenza Mitigation in the United States -

Early, Targeted, Layered Use of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions

CDC, Februay, 2007

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/pdf/community_mitigation-sm.pdf

The manipulation and editing of the visualizations of archived official CDC document by CDC was between September, 2020 and June, 2022 This is the evidence. I have the downloaded original documents I'm able to provide if anyone is interested in validating my claim:

Pandemic Severity Index by Epidemiological Characteristics

https://i.imgflip.com/6jy8fj.jpg

Summary of Community Mitigation Strategies by Pandemic Severity

https://i.imgflip.com/6jy8kj.jpg

Marianne's avatar

everything, that promotes real health is dangerous!

Mrs. M.'s avatar

That was a good show, I donated and look forward to part 2!💝

Elizabeth Van Alstine's avatar

Thanks for being here at 74 years young glad to be able to share my life experiences

Brandon is not your bro's avatar

Godspeed, for the win 🙏

Mrs.  Jenkins's avatar

I cannot thank YOU enough for opening my eyes Dr Tenpenny!! I was skeptical about the Covid vaccines and decided to do some of my own research and that’s when I found YOU 🙌🏻. And I haven’t stopped researching/ reading and spreading the word since!!!! I’m sure my friends are tired of listening to me lol 😂. But I happened to catch the talk on X the other night with Jeff and I donated what I can at this time but wanted to tell you-you and all of this team are in my daily prayers and I’ll give as much as I can for this great cause!! Thank you for saving my family from the death shots (I just had my first grandson 6 months ago and he’s vaccine free ( thanks to YOU 😉) Praise be to God 🙌🏻🙌🏻

Joni's avatar

Dr. Tenpenny, thank you for being the voice of reason and truth during covid and continuing to do so!! You saved countless lives, while those who attacked you and the others are responsible for the deaths of thousands and thousands, if not millions! We will never forget, and we will never be silent! We knew the whole thing was BS! God gave us that discernment!

Dubby Rose's avatar

When I was in high school, learning to type, there was one comment that was always used to practice with. "I may not agree with what you say, but I will fight to the death for your right to say it." It was as common in my youth as "I don't feel safe if you're allowed to speak your truth" seems to (tragically) be true today. As a young girl, it was so drilled into my head, that at 87 I can still recall it. And I still believe it. Living on S.S. doesn't give me a whole lot of budgetary leeway but I could not pass this by without a contribution. I also recall the President, when I was very young, saying "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself", which I would amend today to add "and government and major corporations". However that comment made me hyper aware that every week the gov't was coming up with some new crisis with which to frighten the public. I thought this was the same, but the propaganda was so effective, I finally fell for it for two weeks. Then one day, walking down the street, passing another masked woman, it just came to me it was just a hoax, a test to determine how obedient people would be. I've always listened to my feelings so immediately removed my mask and made no further efforts to "protect" myself from this latest bugagoo. I was very happy that doctors like you had the courage to speak out and continue to do so. And I'm sorry that, if it was a test, it succeeded massively in that way too many people are eagerly participating in their own and their children's destruction. I feel we are in a second Dark Age and honest people like you are in short supply and in dire need. I wish you much success in your lawsuit. It feels like it's a fight for the continuation of the human race.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny's avatar

Thank you for your great work and comment Dubby Rose! Godspeed at 87yo!!

Tina's avatar

Thank you for standing up for all of us - you all are the best of the best and Jeff Childers is an amazing lawyer! I learn so much from each and every one of you! Hoping the recent settlement in Missouri v Biden helps your case!🎉

https://aaronkheriaty.substack.com/p/finally-a-win-in-missouri-v-biden?r=r6ahu&utm_medium=ios

Featherjourney's avatar

Donated a small amount as best I could right now. In my case, it was Dr Tenpenny back then, bravely sharing the mechanisms of injury embedded in the bioweapon jabs. I shared your videos to many. I believe you and several others were truly instrumental in saving the wellness…and perhaps lives…of many!! I personally would never have gotten the jabs (never had a flu vaccine in my 74 yrs) but my husband was a paramedic back then, pressured to get the jab, and thanks to our research, including your information, he made a wise choice and did not succumb to the pressure.

Grateful for your’s and others’ service to the health and well-being of humanity 🙏❤️🕊

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny's avatar

Thank you so much on all counts!!